SIGNAL EDITORIAL DESK English (UK)
News Signal Signal Editorial Desk
Subscribe
Blog Business Local Politics Tech World

Emma Stone Poor Things – Oscar Win, Role, Plot Explained

Henry Clarke Thompson • 2026-04-09 • Reviewed by Oliver Bennett

Emma Stone took home the Academy Award for Best Actress for her role in Poor Things, delivering what many critics described as a transformative performance in Yorgos Lanthimos’s surreal comedy-drama. The film, released in December 2023, brought new attention to a unique literary adaptation that explores themes of female empowerment, bodily autonomy, and personal growth through its peculiar protagonist.

Poor Things received widespread critical acclaim and 11 Academy Award nominations, including Best Picture and Best Director. The movie marked Stone’s third collaboration with Lanthimos, following her Oscar-nominated work in The Favourite. Her portrayal of Bella Baxter, a woman resurrected with her unborn child’s brain, earned praise for its range and boldness.

Based on Alasdair Gray’s 1992 novel, Poor Things combines Frankenstein-inspired elements with social commentary and dark humor. The production brought together an ensemble cast including Willem Dafoe, Mark Ruffalo, and Ramy Youssef, all contributing to the film’s distinctive vision.

Did Emma Stone Win an Oscar for Poor Things?

Director
Yorgos Lanthimos
Emma Stone Role
Bella Baxter
Release
December 2023
Key Award
Best Actress Oscar
Key Facts
  • Emma Stone won Best Actress at the 2024 Academy Awards for her portrayal of Bella Baxter
  • The film received 11 total Oscar nominations, the most of any movie that year
  • Poor Things also won Best Motion Picture at the Golden Globes
  • The movie holds a 92% score on Rotten Tomatoes based on verified reviews
  • Stone described the role as a “lifetime opportunity”
  • The production budget was approximately $35 million
Aspect Details
Director Yorgos Lanthimos
Emma Stone Role Bella Baxter
Release Date December 8, 2023
Runtime 141 minutes
Genre Surreal comedy-drama
Budget $35 million
RT Score 92%
Oscar Nominations 11

What Is Poor Things About?

Poor Things follows Bella Baxter, a woman who dies by suicide while pregnant, only to be resurrected by the eccentric scientist Godwin Baxter. In a twist inspired by Frankenstein, Godwin implants her unborn child’s brain into her adult body. The procedure leaves Bella with an infant’s intellect inside a fully developed woman’s body, creating a unique and unsettling premise.

Under Godwin’s protection, Bella learns rapidly, reportedly acquiring 15 new words each day. Her development includes childlike behaviors such as an awkward gait, yet her body remains that of an adult. This dissonance between mind and body becomes central to her journey of discovery.

Who Does Emma Stone Play in Poor Things?

Emma Stone portrays Bella Baxter, the film’s protagonist. Her performance chronicles Bella’s remarkable evolution from innocent childlike understanding to an empowered woman who rejects subjugation. Bella flees an engagement to Max McCandless, portrayed by Ramy Youssef, and embarks on global adventures alongside lawyer Duncan Wedderburn, played by Mark Ruffalo.

Her travels take her through Lisbon, Alexandria, and Paris, where she explores sexuality, society, and questions of equality. Stone’s portrayal includes explicit scenes that she described in interviews as central to the human experience. Critics praised her performance as “powerhouse” and “brave,” with some reviewers noting it represented a career-defining turn.

Poor Things Ending Explained

The film’s conclusion sees Bella return to care for the dying Godwin, who raised her after the resurrection. She ultimately chooses to marry Max, though the ending remains somewhat ambiguous. Bella declares her intention to chart her own course, rejecting the traditional paths offered by the men in her life. Viewers continue to debate the precise meaning of this resolution.

Critical Consensus on the Ending

Critics have interpreted Bella’s final choice as a statement on female autonomy, with the character actively rejecting control by men throughout her journey. The ambiguity allows for multiple readings of what her future might hold.

Who Directed Poor Things and What Is Its Background?

Greek filmmaker Yorgos Lanthimos directed Poor Things, marking his second Oscar nomination for Best Director. Known for peculiar films including The Lobster and The Favourite, Lanthimos brought his distinctive vision to this adaptation. He developed the project before the death of source material author Alasdair Gray in 2019.

Is Poor Things Based on a Book?

Poor Things is adapted from Scottish author Alasdair Gray’s 1992 novel of the same name. The book is set in 19th-century Glasgow and explores colonial history through a Frankenstein-like narrative. It won the Whitbread Novel Award and the Guardian Fiction Prize, with the London Review of Books calling it Gray’s funniest work.

The Creative Team Behind Poor Things

Tony McNamara wrote the screenplay, earning Oscar recognition for Best Adapted Screenplay. The production blended childlike-to-adult language throughout, reflecting Bella’s developmental journey. Willem Dafoe plays Godwin Baxter, Mark Ruffalo portrays Duncan Wedderburn, and Ramy Youssef appears as Max McCandless.

Director’s Vision

Lanthimos has stated that his films are “meant to be somewhat disturbing… to shake things up engagingly.” Critics have compared his off-beat style to writers like Orwell and Kafka, particularly suited to Gray’s distinctive narrative.

What Are the Reviews and Controversies for Poor Things?

Critics have largely celebrated Poor Things as one of 2023’s most original films, with particular praise for Stone’s performance. Reviewers at major publications described it as unusual yet impactful, noting how it stood apart from the sequel-heavy landscape of contemporary cinema. Stone’s portrayal earned consistent commendation as the film’s strongest element.

Poor Things Reviews and Rotten Tomatoes

The film holds a 92% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, indicating strong critical consensus. While some reviewers noted that certain elements did not fully coalesce, the overall reception emphasized the film’s originality and Stone’s powerhouse performance. The film appeared on numerous year-end best lists.

Why Is Poor Things Controversial?

Controversy surrounding Poor Things centers on its explicit sexual content and nudity. Some observers compared these elements to discussions sparked by Barbie, as both films explore critiques of male control over women’s bodies and choices. Bella’s arc explicitly involves rejecting subjugation, and her journey of sexual discovery forms a core part of her development.

The film’s R rating reflects these mature themes and content. Stone’s no-holds-barred approach to the role contributed to discussions about artistic boundaries and the depiction of female sexuality in cinema.

Content Note

Poor Things carries an R rating for sexual content, nudity, and language. Viewers should research content guidelines before watching, as the film contains explicit material central to its narrative themes.

Timeline of Poor Things

The production and release of Poor Things followed a multi-year development process:

  1. Alasdair Gray novel adaptation officially announced
  2. Principal photography completed
  3. Poor Things released in United States theaters
  4. Emma Stone accepts Best Actress Oscar at the Academy Awards ceremony

What Is Known and Unknown About Poor Things

Established Information Information That Remains Unclear
Emma Stone won Best Actress Oscar Future streaming release date
Film adapted from Alasdair Gray’s 1992 novel Sequel possibilities
11 Academy Award nominations received Exact global box office totals
92% Rotten Tomatoes score Lanthimos’s next project plans
Budget was $35 million Home media release timeline
Golden Globe wins for Picture and Actress International award circuit details

The Significance of Poor Things

Poor Things represents a distinctive achievement in contemporary cinema, blending literary adaptation with singular artistic vision. The film’s themes of female liberation and self-discovery resonated with audiences and critics during its theatrical run. Its combination of bizarre visuals, social commentary, and emotional depth created a unique viewing experience.

The collaboration between Stone and Lanthimos produced what many consider their most ambitious work together. The film’s surreal comedy-drama elements twist social conventions and power dynamics, creating a commentary that extends beyond its period setting. Bella’s journey from infant-minded innocence to empowered womanhood provides both narrative drive and thematic substance.

Director and Cast Perspectives

“Films are meant to be somewhat disturbing… to shake things up engagingly.”

— Yorgos Lanthimos, Director

“Why do people not do that all the time?”

— Emma Stone, describing Bella’s approach to sexual exploration

Stone’s interviews revealed deep engagement with her character’s journey, describing Bella’s sexual awakening as fundamental to understanding womanhood. The actress also referenced the role as a “lifetime opportunity,” suggesting its personal significance within her career trajectory.

Summary

Emma Stone won the Academy Award for Best Actress for Poor Things, delivering a transformative performance as Bella Baxter in Yorgos Lanthimos’s surreal adaptation of Alasdair Gray’s novel. The film earned 11 Oscar nominations and won the Golden Globe for Best Motion Picture, while holding a 92% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Its exploration of female empowerment through bodily autonomy and sexual discovery generated both critical praise and some controversy. The production budget was $35 million, and the film remains notable as one of the most original releases of 2023. For those interested in other recent releases exploring complex themes, readers might compare this with No One Will Save You or I Know What You Did Last Summer.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Emma Stone win Best Actress for Poor Things?

Yes, Emma Stone won the Academy Award for Best Actress at the 2024 ceremony for her portrayal of Bella Baxter in Poor Things.

What is Poor Things rated?

Poor Things carries an R rating for sexual content, nudity, and language. The rating reflects mature themes central to the film’s narrative.

Is Poor Things based on a true story?

No, Poor Things is not based on a true story. It is an adaptation of Alasdair Gray’s 1992 novel, which uses Frankenstein-inspired elements to explore its themes.

How long is Poor Things?

Poor Things has a runtime of 141 minutes, making it approximately two hours and twenty-one minutes long.

What awards did Poor Things win?

Poor Things won Best Actress (Emma Stone) and Best Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy at the Golden Globes. At the Oscars, Stone won Best Actress, and the film received 11 total nominations.

What did Emma Stone say about her Poor Things role?

Stone described the role as a “lifetime opportunity” and noted that Bella’s sexual exploration was central to depicting the human experience. She portrayed the character’s evolution from infant-minded innocence to empowered womanhood.

Where was Poor Things filmed?

Bella’s journey takes her through Lisbon, Alexandria, and Paris, though filming locations for these sequences have not been extensively documented in available sources.


Henry Clarke Thompson

About the author

Henry Clarke Thompson

Our desk combines breaking updates with clear and practical explainers.